| Current Poll |
Should members of the LSU Board of Supervisors disclose who receives their scholarships?
View Results
|
|
Story Archives: Redistricting side effects
- 2013 - 800 articles
- 2012 - 1954 articles
- 2011 - 2029 articles
- December 2011 - 152 articles
- November 2011 - 151 articles
- October 2011 - 169 articles
- September 2011 - 200 articles
- August 2011 - 156 articles
- July 2011 - 160 articles
- June 2011 - 194 articles
- May 2011 - 166 articles
- April 2011 - 164 articles
- April 28th, 2011 (Thursday) - 43 articles
- April 27th, 2011 (Wednesday) - 1 articles
- April 26th, 2011 (Tuesday) - 1 articles
- April 25th, 2011 (Monday) - 1 articles
- April 21st, 2011 (Thursday) - 42 articles
- April 19th, 2011 (Tuesday) - 2 articles
- April 14th, 2011 (Thursday) - 29 articles
- April 13th, 2011 (Wednesday) - 1 articles
- April 12th, 2011 (Tuesday) - 1 articles
- April 11th, 2011 (Monday) - 1 articles
- April 7th, 2011 (Thursday) - 39 articles
- April 6th, 2011 (Wednesday) - 1 articles
- April 5th, 2011 (Tuesday) - 1 articles
- April 1st, 2011 (Friday) - 1 articles
- March 2011 - 204 articles
- February 2011 - 151 articles
- January 2011 - 162 articles
- 2010 - 2139 articles
- 2009 - 2066 articles
- 2008 - 1757 articles
|
Redistricting side effects
State lawmakers approved legislative redistricting plans during the recently completed special session that carved out 29 minority districts in the House and 10 minority districts in the Senate.
There are 105 House districts and 39 Senate districts.
The 29 minority House districts represent an increase of two minority districts over the number of minority districts that existed in the House over the past 10 years. The 10 minority Senate districts are one more than the number of minority districts the Senate featured over the past decade.
The increase in the number of minority districts in the Legislature was part of a compromise House Speaker Jim Tucker and Senate President Joel Chaisson agreed to in convincing lawmakers to adopt redistricting plans the two legislative leaders sponsored.
Redistricting was necessary to reflect shifts in population in Louisiana in light of the 2010 Census.
It was within reason for the Legislature to increase the number of minority districts in the House and Senate since minorities comprise roughly one-third of the state's population. We would be remiss, though, if we did not point out that increasing the number of minority districts in the Legislature prompted lawmakers to draw majority white districts that diluted the number of minorities in those majority white districts. The Legislature did it simply to pacify minority lawmakers who demanded an increase in the number of minority districts.
In time, we will learn whether the Legislature's handling of legislative redistricting passes muster with the U.S. Department of Justice. Justice must sign off on redistricting in Louisiana as well as in other states across the Deep South to ensure minorities were not disenfranchised during the redistricting process.
In time, we witness minorities lose some of their influence over the legislative process at the capitol in Baton Rouge because minority lawmakers will be hard pressed to convince lawmakers who represent those super majority white districts to embrace concerns in the minority community.
That's exactly what will evolve from crafting super majority white legislative districts while compacting minorities in an increased number of minority districts. |
|
|
E-mail Story
Print Story
