| Current Poll |
Should members of the LSU Board of Supervisors disclose who receives their scholarships?
View Results
|
|
Story Archives: Hiring flap snarls Ellington; matter heads to court Jan. 28
- 2013 - 801 articles
- 2012 - 1954 articles
- 2011 - 2029 articles
- 2010 - 2139 articles
- 2009 - 2066 articles
- 2008 - 1757 articles
- December 2008 - 146 articles
- November 2008 - 147 articles
- October 2008 - 232 articles
- September 2008 - 189 articles
- August 2008 - 126 articles
- July 2008 - 147 articles
- June 2008 - 111 articles
- May 2008 - 147 articles
- April 2008 - 141 articles
- March 2008 - 125 articles
- February 2008 - 135 articles
- January 2008 - 111 articles
- January 30th, 2008 (Wednesday) - 24 articles
- January 29th, 2008 (Tuesday) - 2 articles
- January 24th, 2008 (Thursday) - 6 articles
- January 23rd, 2008 (Wednesday) - 13 articles
- January 22nd, 2008 (Tuesday) - 2 articles
- January 21st, 2008 (Monday) - 1 articles
- January 18th, 2008 (Friday) - 1 articles
- January 17th, 2008 (Thursday) - 5 articles
- January 16th, 2008 (Wednesday) - 15 articles
- January 15th, 2008 (Tuesday) - 1 articles
- January 12th, 2008 (Saturday) - 1 articles
- January 10th, 2008 (Thursday) - 6 articles
- January 9th, 2008 (Wednesday) - 10 articles
- January 8th, 2008 (Tuesday) - 2 articles
- January 7th, 2008 (Monday) - 1 articles
- January 6th, 2008 (Sunday) - 1 articles
- January 4th, 2008 (Friday) - 2 articles
- January 3rd, 2008 (Thursday) - 4 articles
- January 2nd, 2008 (Wednesday) - 13 articles
- January 1st, 2008 (Tuesday) - 1 articles
|
Hiring flap snarls Ellington; matter heads to court Jan. 28
State Rep. Noble Ellington's wife, Brenda Anderson Armstrong, can keep her job working for her husband as his legislative assistant, at least until Jan. 28.
That's the date the 19th Judicial District Court in Baton Rouge is scheduled to hear Armstrong's argument that she be allowed to keep her job in spite of a state Ethics Board ruling, which said she had to give it up, according to Ellington.
"As far as I know, nothing else has happened," Ellington said. "Everything is just sitting and waiting."
In a 3-2 vote Thursday, the Ethics Board ruled against Ellington's request that Armstrong be allowed to keep her job as his legislative assistant. Ellington sought the ruling since he was moving from the Senate to the House of Representatives. Ellington was elected to the House in November.
In ruling against Ellington, the Ethics Board cited state ethics laws, which prohibit legislators from directly employing members of their family.
Armstrong has worked as Ellington's legislative assistant since 1988, when Ellington first took office as a member of the state House of Representatives.
The couple married in 2006, after more than 15 years of working together. At that time, Armstrong was "grandfathered" into the position, which meant she was allowed to keep her $54,540-per-year job as Ellington's legislative aid since she worked for him prior to their marriage. Ellington served in the Senate at the time.
In spite of the Ethic Board ruling, Ellington notified the House of Representatives Friday that he would hire Armstrong to serve as his legislative assistant anyway. Butch Speer, clerk for the House of Representatives, blocked Armstrong's hiring, referring to the Ethics Board ruling.
When Speer rejected Ellington's move, Armstrong petitioned the 19th Judicial District Court for a restraining order to prevent her termination.
19th Judicial District Court Judge Don Johnson granted Armstrong's request for a temporary restraining order, which effectively prevented the House from terminating her employment until the case could be heard in court.
Ellington said he believes the court will rule Armstrong should keep her job because the state constitution is clear.
"The constitution reads that it is the Legislature - it is not the House and the Senate," Ellington said. "She has been working for the Legislature for almost 20 years."
Ellington was referring to Armstrong being allowed to keep her job as his legislative assistant after they were married.
To reinforce his position, Ellington pointed to the close vote of the Ethics Board.
"It was a 3-2 vote," Ellington said. "That indicated to me that there was some validity in what we were trying to do."
Ellington also said he has received a generally favorable response from his colleagues in the Legislature.
"I talked to some different people around to find out for sure if I was thinking wrong," Ellington said. "And a lot of the advice I've gotten is I am thinking right."
Ellington noted the Ethics Board's ruling in the matter is not final, but rather, the beginning.
"There is a process after them," Ellington said. "They are not the final say." |
|
|
E-mail Story
Print Story
